🔗 Share this article

The federal appeals court has upheld a ban on deploying national guard in Portland, Oregon, following a recent legal decision.

Appeals Court Agrees to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on this week that it would rehear the case concerning the president’s authority with an expanded panel of 11 judges. The judicial body also overturned a previous ruling from a three-judge panel that had sided with the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This legal directive represents the most recent development in a protracted court case over whether the administration has the legal right and valid reason to send state military units in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in limbo since late September when the mobilization attempt was initiated in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Conflicting Arguments

The federal government has claimed that government employees at the immigration center in south Portland were facing threats, while city and state officials assert that local officers have command of the circumstances.

Contrary to descriptions of Portland as a conflict zone, residents have been sharing videos of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and planning activities such as an protest bicycle event against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The appeals court decision came after a US district judge in the city enacted two temporary restraining orders this period – one preventing the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another stopping the deployment of any national guard troops in Oregon, after efforts to circumvent the first order by calling up out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the ninth circuit panel had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting command of 200 Oregon national guard – but the second ruling remained in place, preventing the physical sending of the troops.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard by the full court – with all decisions under consideration simultaneously – by a group of 11 judges.

“This ruling shows that the truth matters and that the judicial system are striving to ensure government responsibility. The founding document limits the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a testing site for expansive government power,” stated the state attorney general in a statement.

“The court is sending a clear message: the executive leader cannot send the armed forces into American urban areas unnecessarily. We will continue defending state legislation, values, and autonomy as this case moves forward and our legal battle continues in the judicial system.”